H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Istvan Gulyas vs Dick Crealy H2H: 1-1
Istvan Gulyas and Dick Crealy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Istvan Gulyas won the 1972 Rome third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 94
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1972* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Istvan Gulyas | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| May 5, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Dick Crealy | 9-7 6-1 5-7 6-8 6-3 | Istvan Gulyas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istvan Gulyas | #890 | #128 | 0 | 1,803 | 58 | 57 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Istvan Gulyas | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1968 | 24–16 | 60.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1969 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1970 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1971 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #222 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |