H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Istvan Gulyas vs Mark Cox H2H: 2-0
Istvan Gulyas holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Istvan Gulyas leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Istvan Gulyas won the 1968 Roland Garros third round 3-6 8-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 94
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Istvan Gulyas | 3-6 8-6 6-2 6-2 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1968* | Tampa | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Istvan Gulyas | 2-6 0-6 6-0 9-7 6-2 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istvan Gulyas | #890 | #128 | 0 | 1,803 | 58 | 57 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Istvan Gulyas | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 1968 | 24–16 | 60.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | 1969 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |
| 38 | 1970 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1971 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #222 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |