H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Istvan Gulyas vs Tom Edlefsen H2H: 1-2
Tom Edlefsen holds a 2–1 lead over Istvan Gulyas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Edlefsen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Istvan Gulyas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Edlefsen won the 1969 Omaha fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 94
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1969* | Omaha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tom Edlefsen | 7-5 6-4 | Istvan Gulyas | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1968* | Barranquilla | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Istvan Gulyas | 6-2 7-5 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1968* | Pittsburgh Indoors | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tom Edlefsen | 6-2 6-2 | Istvan Gulyas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istvan Gulyas | #890 | #128 | 0 | 1,803 | 58 | 57 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tom Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Istvan Gulyas | Tom Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1968 | 24–16 | 60.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1969 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1970 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1971 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #222 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |