H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2013 Australian Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-1 7-5 | Di Wu | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Dodig | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |