H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Go Soeda H2H: 1-1
Ivan Dodig and Go Soeda are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass, while Go Soeda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2012 Queen's Club third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2012* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Ivan Dodig | 6-3 7-6(3) | Go Soeda | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2012* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Go Soeda | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |