H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-2
Lukasz Kubot holds a 2–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Gstaad third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2012* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Dodig | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |