H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Dodig vs Michael Berrer H2H: 2-0

Ivan Dodig holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Dodig leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2015 Qatar Open second round 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Michael Berrer
GER Age 46 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Dodig #89 7-6(1) 6-2 Michael Berrer #127 Match data Jan 8, 2015* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Michael Berrer #131 6-3 6-4 Ivan Dodig #100 Match data Aug 6, 2012 Q2 Q Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ivan Dodig #84 6-3 6-4 Michael Berrer #66 Match data Feb 6, 2011* F Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Ivan Dodig #196 6-4 6-4 Michael Berrer #107 Match data Jun 8, 2009 Q1 Q Halle Open ATP 250 Grass

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Michael Berrer #952 #42 960 1,783 88 143 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Dodig Michael Berrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #235 1,498 0 0
24 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #126 1,526 0 0
25 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0 2006 4–11 26.7% #152 1,513 0 0
26 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1 2007 13–12 52.0% #57 1,672 0 0
27 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1 2008 8–20 28.6% #131 1,544 0 0
28 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1 2009 5–8 38.5% #74 1,628 0 0
29 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1 2010 20–28 41.7% #58 1,682 0 0
30 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1 2011 17–22 43.6% #100 1,701 0 0
31 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1 2012 5–11 31.2% #138 1,702 0 0
32 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #143 1,619 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2014 3–6 33.3% #128 1,577 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 6–10 37.5% #115 1,682 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2016 4–9 30.8% #182 1,630 0 0
40 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Dodig Michael Berrer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 18 20 38 47.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 11 15 26 42.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
40 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — 66 93 159 41.5% 14 32 46 30.4% 7 17 24 29.2% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's and 231/231 of Michael Berrer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivan Dodig Michael Berrer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5% 2004 1/1 6.0 6.0 67.3% 75.0% 59.5% 83.3% 12.5% 69.9% 30.4%
24 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0% 2005 3/3 5.3 2.7 62.5% 75.1% 47.4% 38.3% 20.0% 64.3% 28.4%
25 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5% 2006 15/15 7.3 4.9 60.7% 72.0% 50.6% 46.5% 44.5% 63.8% 34.0%
26 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9% 2007 25/25 6.6 3.1 62.8% 75.3% 53.0% 64.8% 47.8% 66.9% 34.7%
27 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0% 2008 28/28 5.0 4.2 62.2% 71.3% 48.5% 63.0% 33.3% 62.6% 32.6%
28 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4% 2009 13/13 5.3 4.8 66.1% 67.2% 44.5% 56.2% 38.1% 59.1% 38.0%
29 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2% 2010 48/48 5.2 2.9 63.8% 71.8% 48.4% 58.2% 48.4% 63.2% 33.7%
30 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9% 2011 39/39 5.0 2.9 64.1% 70.2% 48.9% 61.9% 36.7% 62.7% 35.2%
31 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9% 2012 16/16 5.7 2.1 67.9% 65.9% 48.6% 55.4% 30.5% 60.4% 34.2%
32 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9% 2013 5/5 4.0 3.6 65.1% 66.6% 41.8% 67.3% 38.3% 57.7% 41.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 9/9 5.2 2.2 65.3% 69.7% 50.5% 67.3% 56.4% 63.2% 31.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 16/16 9.1 5.3 61.6% 73.3% 47.8% 60.3% 38.4% 63.3% 29.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 13/13 5.0 2.0 68.5% 68.0% 45.1% 55.1% 40.0% 60.9% 33.9%
Career — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7% — 231/231 5.7 3.4 64.0% 70.9% 48.7% 59.4% 40.9% 62.9% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Dodig Michael Berrer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29 2004 1499 100.3 -2.11 -0.14 1.009 50.2% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.08
24 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48 2005 1526 108.7 +0.14 -0.27 0.796 46.0% — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — -0.19
25 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08 2006 1513 118.6 +1.11 -2.59 0.940 48.7% +37 -67 — 41.9% -0.51 1–8 (11%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.15
26 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33 2007 1673 130.6 +2.81 -0.76 1.048 50.8% -7 — -37 50.8% +0.06 3–4 (43%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.13
27 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32 2008 1545 124.1 -0.69 -3.10 0.871 48.0% +23 -66 +67 32.8% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.27
28 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81 2009 1628 128.4 -2.08 +1.27 0.929 48.6% +32 — — 45.7% -0.66 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.28
29 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01 2010 1683 144.9 +0.52 -2.26 0.916 48.7% +31 -202 — 43.4% -0.38 7–9 (44%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.18
30 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31 2011 1702 133.8 +0.20 -1.21 0.942 48.8% 0 -117 -153 40.9% -0.48 7–2 (78%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.63
31 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02 2012 1703 132.9 -1.36 -1.40 0.863 47.4% +51 -96 — 36.6% -0.80 2–6 (25%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.05
32 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39 2013 1619 114.2 -1.90 +0.16 0.984 49.4% — +9 — 55.6% +0.89 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.28
33 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1577 118.3 -1.12 -1.64 0.851 47.7% +99 — — 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.38
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1683 127.9 -0.17 -3.86 0.815 47.5% +39 — — 39.0% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.50
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1630 116.0 -1.84 -2.40 0.866 47.8% +71 -116 — 37.5% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — 0.00
40 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03 — 1784 132.8 +0.02 -1.79 0.914 48.6% +28 -108 -60 41.2% -0.55 31–49 (39%) 43–61 (41%) 94.0 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.