H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 0-1
Stefan Koubek holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Koubek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2010 Australian Open second round 7-6(4) 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Stefan Koubek | 7-6(4) 6-1 6-2 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2009 | Zagreb | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Stefan Koubek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |