H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 2-0
Ivan Dodig holds a 2–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2015 Memphis third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2015* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-2 6-2 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2011* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Ivan Dodig | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |