H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Aaron Krickstein H2H: 7-1

Ivan Lendl holds a 7–1 lead over Aaron Krickstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1993 Canadian Open round of 16 6-7(7) 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Aaron Krickstein
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #7 6-7(7) 6-1 6-2 Aaron Krickstein #62 Match data Jul 31, 1993* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ivan Lendl #3 6-2 6-2 6-1 Aaron Krickstein #22 Match data Jan 23, 1991* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Aaron Krickstein #7 6-3 5-7 6-4 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Apr 14, 1990* SF Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-1 6-3 Aaron Krickstein #8 Match data Nov 28, 1989 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-2 6-2 Aaron Krickstein #17 Match data Mar 26, 1989* QF Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-4 Aaron Krickstein #27 Match data May 9, 1986* R16 Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay
Ivan Lendl #2 6-2 6-2 6-0 Aaron Krickstein #14 Match data Jun 5, 1985* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ivan Lendl #2 6-1 2-6 6-1 Aaron Krickstein #7 Match data May 11, 1985* SF Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Aaron Krickstein #1,299 #6 1,544 2,043 381 252 60.2% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Aaron Krickstein
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 8–5 61.5% #93 1,646 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 34–17 66.7% #12 1,865 0 4
17 — — — — — — — 1985 24–20 54.5% #29 1,767 0 4
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 1986 38–21 64.4% #26 1,841 0 4
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1987 14–12 53.8% #61 1,815 0 4
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1988 47–23 67.1% #15 1,877 0 4
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1989 48–19 71.6% #8 2,007 0 7
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1990 37–26 58.7% #20 1,822 0 7
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1991 28–21 57.1% #34 1,858 0 7
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1992 31–15 67.4% #28 1,827 0 8
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1993 26–19 57.8% #45 1,787 0 9
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1994 30–26 53.6% #35 1,742 0 9
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1995 16–24 40.0% #70 1,595 0 9
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1996 0–4 0.0% #1092 1,536 0 9
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 — — — — — — —
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 — — — — — — —
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Aaron Krickstein
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 1 9 88.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 9 4 13 69.2% 24 9 33 72.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 9 6 15 60.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1986 19 9 28 67.9% 16 8 24 66.7% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1988 31 13 44 70.5% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1989 28 8 36 77.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1990 23 12 35 65.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1991 15 12 27 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1992 19 9 28 67.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1993 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1994 22 15 37 59.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 213 114 327 65.1% 112 81 193 58.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 44 48 92 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Aaron Krickstein
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1646 118.7 — — — — +60 -159 — 52.9% +0.15 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.34
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1866 151.2 — — — — -120 +9 — 61.0% +0.67 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1767 148.6 — — — — +19 +50 — 50.9% +0.23 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — -1.82
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 1986 1841 148.2 — — — — -4 +20 — 58.9% +0.73 14–7 (67%) 12–4 (75%) — -1.08
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1987 1815 146.1 — — — — -24 +34 — 57.4% +0.50 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.73
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1988 1877 146.0 — — — — +24 -70 — 59.7% +0.59 17–4 (81%) 12–12 (50%) — -0.34
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1989 2007 155.0 — — — — +31 -248 -376 63.6% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 15–10 (60%) — -1.36
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1990 1822 155.6 — — — — +56 -31 — 59.5% +0.82 4–5 (44%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.58
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1991 1858 148.6 +2.17 +0.95 1.076 51.6% +28 -70 — 51.2% +0.10 11–5 (69%) 13–14 (48%) — -1.96
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1992 1827 147.6 +1.05 +3.51 1.134 52.4% +25 -16 — 66.1% +1.20 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.22
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1993 1787 146.2 +0.40 +2.91 1.053 51.2% +27 -47 -72 56.1% +0.55 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) — -2.17
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1994 1742 147.9 +0.73 +1.66 1.058 51.1% +14 +4 -16 54.2% +0.44 8–10 (44%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.64
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1995 1595 127.7 -2.33 -1.97 0.850 47.1% +46 +54 +157 42.5% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.56
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1996 1537 98.9 -2.75 -0.44 0.777 44.8% +26 — — 30.8% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.20
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 2044 153.8 +0.43 +1.44 1.029 50.7% +21 -17 -76 56.9% +0.52 116–77 (60%) 116–106 (52%) 101.8 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.