H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 2-0
Ivan Lendl holds a 2–0 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1980 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1980* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1980* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 7-6 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Lendl | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |