H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Chip Hooper H2H: 3-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 3–0 lead over Chip Hooper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1983 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Chip Hooper
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #2 6-3 6-4 Chip Hooper #61 Match data Aug 17, 1983* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-7 7-5 6-2 Chip Hooper #41 Match data Mar 26, 1983* SF Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #3 6-4 7-6 Chip Hooper #26 Match data Apr 3, 1982* SF Frankfurt ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Chip Hooper #1,046 #17 0 1,855 104 119 46.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Chip Hooper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 — — — — — — —
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1980 1–2 33.3% #390 1,500 0 0
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1981 2–4 33.3% — 1,538 0 0
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1982 34–24 58.6% #32 1,767 0 0
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1983 24–24 50.0% #59 1,740 0 0
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1984 18–21 46.2% #96 1,601 0 0
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1985 14–18 43.8% #114 1,675 0 0
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1986 5–12 29.4% #222 1,577 0 0
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1987 6–11 35.3% #150 1,552 0 0
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1988 0–3 0.0% #561 1,505 0 0
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 — — — — — — —
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Chip Hooper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1980 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1982 8 9 17 47.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 10 27 63.0%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1983 12 10 22 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 47 56 103 45.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 13 19 32 40.6% 37 35 72 51.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Chip Hooper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1980 1501 105.5 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.63 — — — +0.28
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1981 1539 121.6 — — — — +43 — — 35.3% -0.53 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.43
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1982 1768 148.4 — — — — -8 -129 -168 55.6% +0.15 12–8 (60%) 22–12 (65%) — -2.42
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1983 1740 143.4 — — — — +49 — -86 53.0% +0.02 7–9 (44%) 16–11 (59%) — -2.82
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1984 1601 120.5 — — — — +93 -39 -36 49.0% -0.08 4–8 (33%) 12–11 (52%) — +5.40
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1985 1676 129.9 — — — — +27 — -91 48.0% -0.40 3–6 (33%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.03
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1986 1578 119.2 — — — — +36 — -32 37.8% -0.71 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.71
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1987 1552 121.0 — — — — +23 — — 41.0% -0.49 0–4 (0%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.31
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1988 1506 103.1 — — — — +11 — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 0–1 — +0.19
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1855 139.7 — — — — +34 -87 -94 49.1% -0.15 28–42 (40%) 60–57 (51%) 99.3 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.