H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs David Pate H2H: 4-1
Ivan Lendl holds a 4–1 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1990 Queen's Club quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1990* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 6-4 | David Pate | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1987* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Pate | 7-6 4-6 7-6 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1986* | Fort Myers | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1985* | Wembley | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | David Pate | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1985* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-3 6-3 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |