H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 1-0
Ivan Lendl holds a 1–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1993 Nice semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1993* | Nice | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 6-3 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 |