H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Guy Forget H2H: 3-1
Ivan Lendl holds a 3–1 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guy Forget won the 1992 Brussels quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1992* | Brussels | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Guy Forget | 6-2 7-6(4) | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1991 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 6-4 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| May 14, 1988* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1985 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-0 6-2 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Guy Forget | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |