H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Jay Berger H2H: 3-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 3–0 lead over Jay Berger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1988 US Open round of 64 6-2 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jay Berger
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-4 6-1 Jay Berger #35 Match data Sep 2, 1988* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-3 6-0 Jay Berger #36 Match data Aug 13, 1988* R16 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-3 6-1 6-1 Jay Berger #84 Match data Mar 1, 1987* QF Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Jay Berger #1,121 #7 1,271 1,947 141 80 63.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Jay Berger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 1985 3–2 60.0% #250 1,571 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1986 7–3 70.0% #82 1,665 0 1
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1987 28–19 59.6% #47 1,768 0 1
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1988 28–16 63.6% #34 1,785 0 2
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1989 41–19 68.3% #10 1,841 0 3
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1990 32–18 64.0% #18 1,845 0 3
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1991 2–3 40.0% #387 1,801 0 3
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 — — — — — — —
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 — — — — — — —
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 — — — — — — —
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 — — — — — — —
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 — — — — — — —
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 — — — — — — —
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Jay Berger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1987 13 9 22 59.1% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1990 19 7 26 73.1% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1991 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 81 42 123 65.9% 50 28 78 64.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Jay Berger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 1985 1572 112.9 — — — — +57 — — 57.9% -0.10 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.70
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1986 1665 116.1 — — — — -50 -34 — 61.5% -0.04 3–1 (75%) — — +0.72
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1987 1768 146.6 — — — — -24 -22 — 59.7% +0.65 7–6 (54%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.38
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1988 1785 145.3 — — — — +58 -65 — 63.1% +1.00 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.25
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1989 1842 151.4 — — — — -18 +50 — 64.2% +1.07 10–6 (63%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.56
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1990 1845 149.4 — — — — +64 -35 — 56.8% +0.30 13–6 (68%) 10–4 (71%) — +2.67
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1991 1801 113.3 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +47 — — 46.2% +0.16 — — — +0.13
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1948 150.8 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +20 -16 — 60.6% +0.68 39–26 (60%) 26–25 (51%) 102.1 +1.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.