H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Jim Grabb H2H: 4-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 4–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1993 Philadelphia fourth round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ivan Lendl #9 6-4 7-6(3) Jim Grabb #53 Match data
Jul 17, 1992* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #12 6-1 7-6(2) Jim Grabb #80 Match data
Jul 28, 1991* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Ivan Lendl #4 7-6(8) 6-7(7) 7-5 Jim Grabb #142 Match data
Oct 2, 1987* San Francisco ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 7-5 6-2 Jim Grabb #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 — — — — — — —
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94 — — — — — — —