H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Joao Soares H2H: 2-0
Ivan Lendl holds a 2–0 lead over Joao Soares in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1984 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 75
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1984* | Luxembourg | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-3 | Joao Soares | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1982* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-3 6-3 | Joao Soares | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Joao Soares | #856 | #74 | 0 | 1,615 | 42 | 99 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Joao Soares | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1975 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #235 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1979 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #137 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #194 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1981 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #194 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 1982 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #96 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 1983 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |