H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Johan Kriek H2H: 10-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 10–0 lead over Johan Kriek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 6–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1987 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 7-6 6-2.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10 0
10 main draw meetings
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Ivan Lendl #1 6-3 7-6 6-2 Johan Kriek #41 Match data
Jun 8, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-1 6-0 Johan Kriek #19 Match data
Mar 29, 1986* Chicago ATP 250 QF Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 6-3 Johan Kriek #15 Match data
Nov 16, 1985* Wembley ATP 250 QF Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-1 Johan Kriek #10 Match data
Sep 8, 1983* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #2 6-2 6-4 6-1 Johan Kriek #13 Match data
Aug 14, 1983* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 QF Hard Ivan Lendl #2 6-2 6-1 Johan Kriek #15 Match data
Mar 12, 1983* Brussels ATP 250 QF Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 6-3 6-2 Johan Kriek #16 Match data
Oct 21, 1982* Naples Finals Wct ATP Finals SF Carpet Ivan Lendl #3 6-4 6-4 7-5 Johan Kriek #13 Match data
Mar 13, 1982* Munich-2 Wct ATP 250 SF Carpet Ivan Lendl #3 6-4 6-3 Johan Kriek #8 Match data
Mar 28, 1980* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ivan Lendl #20 6-2 6-2 Johan Kriek #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,052 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Johan Kriek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 1977 1–2 33.3% #278 1,510 0 0
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,781 0 0
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,879 0 1
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,976 0 1
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,955 1 4
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,960 2 7
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,952 2 10
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,916 2 12
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,907 2 13
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,880 2 13
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,737 2 14
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,788 2 14
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14