H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 2-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 2–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #1 7-6 6-3 6-4 Leonardo Lavalle #61 Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 0-6 6-4 6-2 Leonardo Lavalle #89 Match data Nov 29, 1985* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Leonardo Lavalle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Leonardo Lavalle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Leonardo Lavalle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.10
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.81
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.27
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.85
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.14
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.27
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.