H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 4-3

Ivan Lendl holds a 4–3 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–1 on carpet, while Ivan Lendl leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1994 Delray Beach Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #60 6-3 6-4 Ivan Lendl #28 Match data May 14, 1994* QF Delray Beach Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Mark Woodforde #41 5-4 (ret.) Ivan Lendl #9 Match data Feb 21, 1993* F Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Mark Woodforde #61 6-4 6-2 Ivan Lendl #8 Match data Nov 13, 1992* R16 Antwerp ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #9 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #52 Match data Oct 9, 1992* R16 Sydney Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #3 6-2 7-6 Mark Woodforde #93 Match data Oct 11, 1990* R32 Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 7-5 6-7 6-7 7-5 10-8 Mark Woodforde #54 Match data Jun 29, 1988* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 6-3 6-1 Mark Woodforde #56 Match data Jan 17, 1988* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/250 of Ivan Lendl's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivan Lendl Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 1991 62/73 7.3 3.1 54.8% 76.4% 54.6% 64.9% 47.8% 66.6% 41.8% 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 1992 68/75 6.7 2.8 55.5% 76.8% 54.4% 64.4% 43.8% 66.7% 41.1% 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 1993 52/56 6.3 2.3 56.4% 74.6% 50.0% 56.4% 42.3% 63.6% 40.0% 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 1994 43/46 7.1 2.4 53.5% 75.8% 54.0% 61.7% 41.4% 65.6% 41.3% 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
Career — 225/1,272 6.8 2.7 55.2% 76.0% 53.4% 62.2% 44.1% 65.7% 41.1% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.07
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.28
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.67
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.00
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.09
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.18
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.26
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) — -3.48
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.21
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.31
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.71
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) — -3.08
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.85
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.36
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.93
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.