H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Paolo Cane H2H: 3-0
Ivan Lendl holds a 3–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1989 Key Biscayne third round 7-5 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 7-5 6-0 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ivan Lendl | 3-6 7-6 6-7 7-5 6-1 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| May 17, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-2 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |