H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Pat Cash H2H: 5-3

Ivan Lendl holds a 5–3 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Ivan Lendl leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1988 Australian Open semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Pat Cash
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Pat Cash #7 6-4 2-6 6-2 4-6 6-2 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data
Oct 18, 1987* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 F Hard Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 6-2 6-4 Pat Cash #8 Match data
Jul 6, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Pat Cash #7 7-6 6-2 7-5 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data
Jan 25, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Grass Pat Cash #24 7-6 5-7 7-6 6-4 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data
Oct 18, 1986* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Lendl #1 7-5 6-2 Pat Cash #79 Match data
Sep 10, 1984* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Ivan Lendl #2 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-7 7-6 Pat Cash #7 Match data
Dec 8, 1983* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Ivan Lendl #1 7-6 6-3 6-3 Pat Cash #37 Match data
Jun 29, 1983* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Ivan Lendl #3 6-4 7-6 6-1 Pat Cash #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Pat Cash
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,697 0 1
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,829 0 2
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,905 0 2
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,833 0 2
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,878 0 2
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,949 1 5
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,872 1 6
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,806 1 6
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,817 1 6
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 — — — — — — —
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,767 1 6
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,677 1 6
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,616 1 6
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,574 1 6
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94 — — — — — — —