H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1980 Indianapolis round of 64 2-6 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ricardo Cano
ARG Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #10 2-6 6-0 6-4 Ricardo Cano #72 Match data Aug 6, 1980* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Ricardo Cano #768 #42 0 1,797 140 145 49.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Ricardo Cano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1972 2–5 28.6% — 1,477 0 0
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,489 0 0
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1974 2–2 50.0% #274 1,503 0 0
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1975 18–13 58.1% #42 1,738 0 0
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1976 43–26 62.3% #51 1,732 0 0
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1977 18–24 42.9% #99 1,674 0 0
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1978 10–13 43.5% #81 1,632 0 0
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1979 3–10 23.1% #169 1,566 0 0
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1980 3–8 27.3% #73 1,543 0 0
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 1981 33–24 57.9% #62 1,716 0 0
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 1982 3–11 21.4% #91 1,608 0 0
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 1983 4–6 40.0% #219 1,580 0 0
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Ricardo Cano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1975 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 38 23 61 62.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1978 — — — — 10 13 23 43.5% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1979 — — — — 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — — — — —
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1980 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 1981 4 1 5 80.0% 29 22 51 56.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1982 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 9 8 17 52.9% 128 129 257 49.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Ricardo Cano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1970 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.67 — — — -0.19
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1971 1490 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1972 1477 95.2 — — — — — +34 — 30.0% -1.45 1–1 — — +0.44
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1973 1490 106.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1974 1504 106.5 — — — — — +29 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.69
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1975 1739 141.6 — — — — — +46 — 51.9% +0.06 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.44
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1976 1732 133.4 — — — — -109 +26 — 56.2% +0.47 14–8 (64%) 7–4 (64%) — +6.25
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1977 1674 138.6 — — — — -85 +10 — 43.4% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.77
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1978 1632 125.5 — — — — — +5 — 44.6% -0.20 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +1.33
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1979 1567 118.1 — — — — — -5 — 36.1% -0.89 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.24
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1980 1543 122.9 — — — — — -2 — 37.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) — — +0.12
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 1981 1717 140.9 — — — — -79 +17 — 54.5% +0.30 11–4 (73%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.92
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 1982 1608 117.3 — — — — -14 +43 — 26.5% -1.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.08
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 1983 1581 107.3 — — — — — +48 — 46.4% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.87
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1797 137.7 — — — — -81 +21 — 47.7% -0.16 51–43 (54%) 33–30 (52%) 106.0 +3.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.