H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Thomas Muster H2H: 5-1

Ivan Lendl holds a 5–1 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1994 Madrid quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 1994* Madrid ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #11 2-6 6-3 6-0 Ivan Lendl #22 Match data
Apr 10, 1992* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Ivan Lendl #9 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #38 Match data
Nov 12, 1990 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Ivan Lendl #3 6-3 6-3 Thomas Muster #7 Match data
Mar 27, 1989* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 F Hard Ivan Lendl #1 (w/o) Thomas Muster #14 Match data
Jan 29, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Ivan Lendl #2 6-2 6-4 5-7 7-5 Thomas Muster #15 Match data
Feb 26, 1987* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Lendl #1 3-6 6-4 6-0 6-2 Thomas Muster #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44