H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 7-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 7–0 lead over Tim Gullikson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 4–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1984 Philadelphia fourth round 6-1 6-2.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 27, 1984* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ivan Lendl #2 6-1 6-2 Tim Gullikson Match data
Aug 14, 1982* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #4 6-4 7-6 Tim Gullikson Match data
Aug 13, 1981* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Lendl #4 6-1 6-2 Tim Gullikson Match data
Apr 2, 1981* Frankfurt ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivan Lendl #5 6-3 7-6 Tim Gullikson Match data
Feb 5, 1981* Richmond Wct ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivan Lendl #6 6-0 6-2 Tim Gullikson Match data
Aug 16, 1980* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #10 6-7 6-3 6-4 Tim Gullikson Match data
Apr 18, 1980* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #13 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tim Gullikson Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Tim Gullikson 2,010 0 0 0 0 3 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94