H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Todd Martin H2H: 4-1
Ivan Lendl holds a 4–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1994 Sydney Outdoor semifinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1994* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1993* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 6-4 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1993* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Martin | 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1992* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ivan Lendl | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1992* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-3 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |