H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Albert Portas H2H: 3-1
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2006 Gstaad third round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 7-6(5) | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2003* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-4 6-3 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2000* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-5 6-1 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1997* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |