H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Andre Agassi H2H: 1-2
Andre Agassi holds a 2–1 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andre Agassi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andre Agassi won the 2005 Rome Masters fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2005* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andre Agassi | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2001* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-2 6-4 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-4 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Andre Agassi | #413 | #1 | 5,652 | 2,241 | 836 | 268 | 75.7% | 8 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 59 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Andre Agassi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 60–11 | 84.5% | #3 | 2,061 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #7 | 1,954 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,961 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #9 | 1,972 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #24 | 1,943 | 1 | 19 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 52–14 | 78.8% | #2 | 2,145 | 2 | 24 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 71–9 | 88.8% | #2 | 2,183 | 3 | 31 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #8 | 2,000 | 3 | 33 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #110 | 1,833 | 3 | 33 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #6 | 1,967 | 3 | 38 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 63–13 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,118 | 5 | 43 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 36–15 | 70.6% | #6 | 1,973 | 6 | 44 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #3 | 1,956 | 7 | 48 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #2 | 2,011 | 7 | 53 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 47–10 | 82.5% | #4 | 2,042 | 8 | 57 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–13 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,002 | 8 | 58 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,049 | 8 | 59 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #150 | 1,912 | 8 | 59 |