H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 1-1
Ivan Ljubicic and Bohdan Ulihrach are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 2002 Monte Carlo Masters second round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-7(4) 1-6 6-4 7-6(7) 9-7 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |