H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs David Ferrer H2H: 1-5

David Ferrer holds a 5–1 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2010 Beijing semifinal 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 SF Hard David Ferrer #11 6-4 4-6 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #17 Match data
Apr 16, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #17 6-0 7-6(4) Ivan Ljubicic #14 Match data
Feb 26, 2009* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #14 3-6 6-2 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #53 Match data
May 18, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #14 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #8 Match data
Jul 17, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay David Ferrer #63 7-6(3) 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #43 Match data
May 8, 2003* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #46 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 — — — — — — — 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 — — — — — — — 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27