H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 1-2
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 2–1 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2011 Marseille fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Dmitry Tursunov | 5-7 4-6 6-1 7-6(6) 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(2) 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |