H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 4-5

Fabrice Santoro holds a 5–4 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2009 Eastbourne quarterfinal 3-6 4-2 RET.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2009* Eastbourne ATP 250 QF Grass Fabrice Santoro #41 3-6 4-2 (ret.) Ivan Ljubicic #75 Match data
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #49 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #24 Match data
Mar 25, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #7 3-6 6-3 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #56 Match data
Oct 7, 2005* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #16 4-6 6-1 7-6(3) Fabrice Santoro #80 Match data
Aug 17, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #81 6-7(4) 7-6(7) 7-5 Ivan Ljubicic #17 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #58 6-4 7-6(4) Ivan Ljubicic #26 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #38 7-6(3) 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #48 Match data
Mar 2, 2002* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Fabrice Santoro #26 6-4 7-6(5) Ivan Ljubicic #33 Match data
Nov 23, 2000* Brighton ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #89 7-6(5) 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6