H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-1

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #37 6-3 7-6(6) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #20 Match data
Oct 14, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #37 6-4 7-6(6) Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Feb 25, 2005* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #14 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(8) Fernando Verdasco #37 Match data
Apr 16, 2004* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #73 6-4 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7