H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 2-2
Ivan Ljubicic and Gaston Gaudio are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 2–1 on clay, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2002 Gstaad semifinal 4-6 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2002* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2001* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2001* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-1 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1999* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |