H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Gustavo Kuerten H2H: 2-4

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 4–2 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2008 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-2.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 22, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #29 6-1 6-2 Gustavo Kuerten #1145 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #19 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #36 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #48 7-6(1) 6-2 Gustavo Kuerten #1 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 7-6(5) 7-5 Ivan Ljubicic #46 Match data
May 9, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #74 Match data
Aug 16, 1996* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #115 6-2 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #969 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Gustavo Kuerten
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10