H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2004 Roland Garros first round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2002* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 4-1 (ret.) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-2 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |