H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-2
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 2–0 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Beijing quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2006* | Beijing | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 7-6(3) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 3-6 6-3 1-1 (ret.) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Ljubicic | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |