H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Jan Hernych H2H: 3-0
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2010 Dubai third round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2010* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2004 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |