H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 3-3

Ivan Ljubicic and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2011 Metz final 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2011* Metz ATP 250 F Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #29 Match data
Apr 13, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #40 7-6(2) 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #17 Match data
Feb 12, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 SF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #18 6-4 7-6(6) Ivan Ljubicic #15 Match data
Feb 25, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #26 7-5 6-3 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #11 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #54 6-4 7-5 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #9 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-7(4) 7-6(8) 7-6(7) 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16
34 — — — — — — — 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 — — — — — — — 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18