H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Juan Carlos Ferrero H2H: 3-3

Ivan Ljubicic and Juan Carlos Ferrero are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 2–1 on clay, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2011 Umag fourth round 1-6 6-3 6-4.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 2011* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #73 1-6 6-3 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #32 Match data
May 27, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #103 2-6 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #53 Match data
Oct 16, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 F Hard Ivan Ljubicic #13 6-2 6-4 7-6(5) Juan Carlos Ferrero #22 Match data
Sep 27, 2003* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #1 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #45 Match data
May 9, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #36 7-5 6-2 Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 Match data
Feb 22, 2001* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #92 7-6(2) 6-4 Juan Carlos Ferrero #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Juan Carlos Ferrero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10