H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 1-1
Ivan Ljubicic and Juan Martin del Potro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay, while Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2011 Indian Wells Masters second round 5-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2009* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Juan Martin del Potro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Juan Martin del Potro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 |