H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 4-2

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 4–2 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julien Benneteau leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2010 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2010* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Julien Benneteau #38 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #24 Match data
Oct 13, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #37 6-3 3-6 6-1 Julien Benneteau #33 Match data
Jun 23, 2007* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 SF Grass Ivan Ljubicic #13 7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 Julien Benneteau #57 Match data
Jun 9, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Ivan Ljubicic #4 6-2 6-2 6-3 Julien Benneteau #95 Match data
Mar 25, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Julien Benneteau #121 7-6(3) 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #40 Match data
Oct 12, 2001* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #48 7-5 7-5 Julien Benneteau #343 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,955 269 292 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,547 0 0
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,533 0 0
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,793 0 0
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,853 0 0
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,871 0 0
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2012 26–21 55.3% #35 1,874 0 0
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,861 0 0
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,801 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,807 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,862 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0