H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Magnus Norman H2H: 1-3
Magnus Norman holds a 3–1 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 3–0 on clay, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2001 Miami Masters third round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2000* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-2 7-5 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1999* | Umag | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-0 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1998* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Magnus Norman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |