H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 2-4

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 4–2 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Rotterdam quarterfinal 6-4 6-7(6) 7-6(4).

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #15 6-4 6-7(6) 7-6(4) Marcos Baghdatis #20 Match data
Oct 31, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #22 6-4 7-6(4) Ivan Ljubicic #15 Match data
Sep 15, 2007* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #12 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data
Feb 4, 2007* Zagreb ATP 250 F Carpet Marcos Baghdatis #21 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #8 Match data
Jan 27, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #54 6-4 6-2 4-6 3-6 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #8 Match data
Jan 21, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #155 7-6(1) 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4