H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 7-1

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 7–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Beijing quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 2011* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #26 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #37 Match data
Oct 7, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #17 6-3 7-6(3) Mikhail Youzhny #8 Match data
Feb 25, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 F Hard Mikhail Youzhny #22 6-2 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #8 Match data
Feb 3, 2007* Zagreb ATP 250 SF Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #8 2-6 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #22 Match data
Jan 6, 2007* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #5 2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Mikhail Youzhny #24 Match data
Aug 17, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #3 6-4 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #44 Match data
Feb 4, 2006* Zagreb ATP 250 QF Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #5 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #47 Match data
May 16, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Ivan Ljubicic #40 4-6 7-5 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10