H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 3-2

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2011 Australian Open third round 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #14 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #16 Match data
Apr 28, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #15 7-5 7-6(3) Nicolas Almagro #34 Match data
Jul 31, 2009* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #64 7-5 7-6(2) Nicolas Almagro #35 Match data
Aug 16, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #32 6-4 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #11 Match data
Aug 9, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #4 7-5 6-1 Nicolas Almagro #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10