H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 3-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–3 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 Paris Masters third round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2008* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 7-6(5) 7-5 Ivan Ljubicic #48 Match data
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #30 4-6 2-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
May 14, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #29 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 SF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #8 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Nikolay Davydenko #3 Match data
Oct 8, 2005* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #16 6-1 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #7 Match data
Apr 24, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #69 6-2 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #41 Match data
Jan 3, 2003* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #81 4-6 6-4 7-6(9) Ivan Ljubicic #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21