H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-2
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–1 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2011 Queen's Club third round 0-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2011* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 0-6 7-5 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2007* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2005* | Milan | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |