H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-1
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–1 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2011* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 10, 2009* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Ivan Ljubicic | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2008* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-5 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Ljubicic | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |